Flying Horse North Filing No. 9
11 lots in Flying Horse North - subject to PUDSP amendment
- Location
- ALLEN RANCH RD; QUARTZ CREEK DR, 80908
- Jurisdiction
- El Paso County
- Applicant
- HR Green Inc. Blaine Perkins
- Land owner (assessor)
- PRI #2 LLC
- County project manager
- Ryan Howser
- Filed
- Apr 15, 2026
- Parcels
- 6136000008, 6136000009
- Map
-
Parcel boundaries: Colorado public parcel data · Basemap © OpenStreetMap contributors
- Area map
- See all Tri-Lakes projects on the map
- Source record
- El Paso County EDARP file
Documents (43)
Mailing LabelsadditionalOct 9, 2026
Mailing Labels for the 11 surrounding property owners that received notices. Cost = $8.58. JM
Neighbor Notice & Vicinity MapadditionalOct 9, 2026
"Notice of Administrative Decision" letters were mailed by PCD on 10/09/2026. The potential decision can be made after 10/23/2026. JM
Agency review comments (13)
PCD Administrative Noticereview 1Oct 9, 2026
On 10/09/2026, PCD mailed "Notice of Administrative Determination" letters for SF2625 to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (11 addresses). The potential date an administrative decision can be made is 10/23/2026. Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage = $8.58. JM
Parks Advisory Boardreview 1Oct 2, 2026
El Paso County Parks Department, Final Comments - Please See Attached Documentation. Comments and recommendations are being provided administratively and do not require endorsement by the El Paso County Park Advisory Board. Thank you!
EPC Parks Departmentreview 1Oct 2, 2026
El Paso County Parks Department, Final Comments - Please See Attached Documentation. Comments and recommendations are being provided administratively and do not require endorsement by the El Paso County Park Advisory Board. Thank you!
Black Forest Land Use Committeereview 1Oct 1, 2026
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no objections to this filing.
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 1Sep 30, 2026
1. Addressing has been received and should be added to the plat. Add the addressing to the plat. Each address should be running parallel to the street they are being addressed from. Addressing should be as close to the edge of the lot as possible. This indicates and is made clear to anyone looking at the plat, which street the lot is addressed from.
2. A readdressing fee of $50.00 will be added to the plat fee when Enumerations reviews the mylar prior to plat.
3. Final plat comments:
a. Enumerations will review the pre-plat (mylar) prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block.
b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the pre-plat, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. As of December 5th 2023, the fee for all credit/debit cards has changed from the flat 2.95% fee to the following: Over the phone Credit/Debit Card payments will be 2.3% and In-Person Debit Card payments will be 1.5% (in-person only). Paid directly to the Enumerations Department.
c. Pre-plat reviews can be reviewed via “pdf” or in-person. The pre-plat will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations stamping the pre-plat and receiving payment of plat fees. If any pre-plat changes occur, even if changes do not apply to Enumerations, we still need to re-stamp the pre-plat. The Enumerations stamped pre-plat copy should match the recorded document minus a few signatures. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website, https://www.pprbd.org/Home/BookAppt
d. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to approval in the Enumerations department on any COMMERCIAL plan submittal. Please email the Enumerations staff member that reviewed your project. Amy@pprbd.org; Brent@pprbd.org; or BeckyA@pprbd.org
Amy Vanderbeek
Enumerations Plans Examiner
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org
E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 1Sep 28, 2026
No action for E911 on this submittal.
Thank you.
Justin
US Army Corps of Engineersreview 1Sep 28, 2026
USACE has no comments.
El Paso County Conservation Distreview 1Sep 26, 2026
The El Paso County Conservation District has reviewed this and we have the following comments:
1) Erosion controls/Revegetation plans/Watershed protections
We did see there is now an erosion control plan during and post construction of the proposed roads and development phase, but noted it is also inadequate in some ways. We feel that these comments are particularly important for both the road and house construction phases because this sits in a drainage of E Cherry Creek that not only drains into the local golf course ponds, but also further down within about a mile is also the Franktown Parker FPE - 2 Reservoir. This is a stormwater control dam that El Paso County maintains and EPPC shares an easement on, as well is part of regular inspections of through our MOU with El Paso County. As such, EPCCD would like to see the following recommendations followed during and after construction:
A) Disturbed areas not being built on should be mulched and revegetated within 45 days of disturbance using plant/grass species native and/or naturalized to El Paso County, weather depending.
B) In the GEC plan, they describe mulching as a practice without a rate. So we would like to see the following added: Disturbed areas be either: mulched after seeding with either weed-free hay or straw mulch at approximately 5,000 lbs per acre; Or approx. 1-2" of wood mulch coverage of these disturbed areas made from forest mitigation work and tree clearing on site; Or areas that are not suitable for revegetation such as driveways, parking areas (if not going to be paved), or safety areas around buildings should have a 1-2" thick layer of crushed rock, road base, or gravel to assist in preventing having exposed soil that would be prone to wind/runoff erosion concerns. These will also be needed for the home building phase.
C) The current GEC has silt fencing. But we would like to share that prior to any soil work even for houses, silt fences need to be installed around all work areas to ensure loose soil does not become an erosion issue for the drainage in the event of heavy rainfall events. This helps protect the upstream portions of the drainage leading to the FPE-2 dam.
D) For areas being replanted with natural grass, consider using the El Paso County Conservation District’s Native Shotgun Mix (available at EPCCD.org) for reseeding, which is well suited to soils present on this site and is comprised of 100% native and naturalized grass species.
2) Firewise, Fire Risk, and Forest Health
EPCCD has a strong commitment to forest health and fire safety within the areas we serve, particularly within Black Forest. The project site is located in a lightly forested transition area of Black Forest that carries an elevated wildfire risk, particularly due to its close proximity to the Hwy 83 Corridor, which is very heavily overgrown. The applicant had a fantastic Forest Management plan is obviously working with a forestry expert already to manage forest health, so we have no comments to add on that topic. We did not see an Firewise plans for when house construction begins, so we would like to see the following implemented to assist with these issues:
A) Vegetation management consistent with Firewise principles, including clearing trees and brush within approximately 35 feet of the proposed building. Trees should also be cleared to approximately 15 feet from the centerline on each side of all driveways, which is critical for safe emergency vehicle access and for faster emergency egress of residence in the event of a wildfire.
B) Thinning forested areas within 35–100 feet beyond the proposed houses (as recommended by Firewise practices) to approximately 40–60 trees per acre, reflecting a healthy Ponderosa pine and Douglas fir forest density based on U.S. Forest Service and Colorado State Forest Service guidance. This also supports improved fire resilience, wildlife habitat, and visual quality consistent with the El Paso County Master Plan for this area.
If these measures are added to the project's plan, then the El Paso County Conservation District will be content with the applicant's commitment to soil conservation, watershed protection, and protection of the surrounding community.
For any questions, please feel free to contact the EPCCD at 719-600-4706 or Will Vogl - Board VP at Will@EPCCD.org
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.review 1Sep 24, 2026
See attached comment letter
Academy SD 20 Building Fundreview 1Sep 24, 2026
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #SF2625 for approval of the Flying Horse North Filing No. 9. The District is requesting fees in lieu of land dedication per the existing County Code for all residential units within this development.
The District is able to serve each student who is a resident of District 20.
If you need additional information, please contact me.
Peter Ristig
Executive Director for Operations
Academy School District
peter.ristig@asd20.org
Land ownership timeline
- Jun 26, 2026Parcels 6136000008, 6136000009 acquired by PRI #2 LLC for $10 (assessor record)
Timeline
- Oct 9, 2026Payment Request sent: 10/9/2026
- Oct 9, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by PCD Administrative Notice
- Oct 2, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Parks Advisory Board
- Oct 2, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC Parks Department
- Oct 1, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
- Oct 1, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Black Forest Land Use Committee
- Sep 30, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
- Sep 29, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC Environmental Services
- Sep 28, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Sep 28, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by US Army Corps of Engineers
- Sep 26, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 25, 2026First appeared on the EDARP active list
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by RBD Floodplain
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Academy SD 20 Building Fund
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Bill Crimmel on behalf of Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)(to also include the TLLU areas)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by William Vogl on behalf of El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Harry Thomas on behalf of El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Katie Miller on behalf of El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Mariah Hudson on behalf of El Paso County Conservation Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Dave Munger on behalf of Council of Neighborhood Organizations (CONO)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by LaShunda Simpson on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Zaker Alazzeh on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Jonathan Scherer on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Joel Dagnillo on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Hao Vo on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Erin Powers on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by General Email on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Brian Shevock on behalf of Colorado Springs Public Works
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by l chiffolo on behalf of Cherokee Metro Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Ethan Ford on behalf of Cherokee Metro Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Brandon Zembles on behalf of Cherokee Metro Dist
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Trish Riber on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Marcus Henderson on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Bob Swatek on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Cheryl Pixley on behalf of Black Forest Trails Association
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Terry Stokka on behalf of Black Forest Land Use Committee
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Tony Cerrone on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Rachel Dunn on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Michael Alvarado on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Fielding Lucas on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Cody Poole on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Chad Herdt on behalf of Black Forest Fire Protection District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Peter Ristig on behalf of Academy SD 20 Building Fund
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Mike Redmond on behalf of Academy SD 20 Building Fund
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Kyle Fenner on behalf of Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Drew Foxx on behalf of Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Allison Stocker on behalf of Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Alexander Painter on behalf of Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Keith Curtis on behalf of RBD Floodplain
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Kimberly Wilkes on behalf of US Forest Service, Pikes Peak Ranger District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Jennifer DeWoody on behalf of US Forest Service, Pikes Peak Ranger District
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Julie Reeves on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by george san miguel on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by George San Miguel on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Daniel Delgado on behalf of US Army Corps of Engineers
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Mike Till on behalf of Colorado State Forest Service
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Victoria Poulton on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Travis Sauder on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Tim Kroening on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Peter Chapman on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Karen Voltura on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Carolyn Craveiro de Sa on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Colorado Geological Survey on behalf of Colorado Geological Survey
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Teresa Guagliardo on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Michelle Regalado on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Kimberly Blanchard on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Adam Lancaster on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by General Email on behalf of Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Meredith Nichols on behalf of Pikes Peak OEM (Office of Emergency Management)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Amanda Meldrum on behalf of Pikes Peak OEM (Office of Emergency Management)
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of Parks Advisory Board
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Heidi Williams on behalf of EPC Sheriff's Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Jeff Kramer on behalf of EPC Sheriff's Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Lizz Floro on behalf of EPC Sheriff's Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of EPC Public Works, County Engineer
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of EPC Parks Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Catherine McGarvy on behalf of EPC Health Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by HEAEH LandUse on behalf of EPC Health Department
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Kathy Andrew on behalf of EPC Environmental Services
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Mikayla Hartford on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Zachary Jannusch on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Glenn Reese on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Erica Rylander on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Christina Prete on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Gilbert LaForce on behalf of EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Engineering Manager on behalf of EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Justin Annan on behalf of E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Glenn West on behalf of E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Lori Seago on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Erika Keech on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by April Willie on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by Justin Kilgore on behalf of PCD Project Manager
- Sep 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Flying Horse North Filing No. 9 for review by on behalf of PCD Administrative Notice
- Sep 24, 2026Fees paid: 9/24/2026 (Receipt: 1012696)
- Sep 23, 2026File # Assigned: SF2625
- Sep 23, 2026Payment Request sent: 9/23/2026
- Sep 23, 2026Submission Triaged
- Sep 22, 2026Submission received from Applicant
- Sep 22, 2026Submission request sent to Applicant
- Sep 22, 2026Submission Triaged
- Sep 22, 2026Submission received from Applicant
- Sep 4, 2026Submission request sent to Applicant
- Apr 15, 2026Project Created
- Apr 15, 2026Project Manager Assigned: Ryan Howser
