Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan
This application is for a Preliminary Plan to allow for the creation of 72 single-family lots and 2 lots for religious institutions. The applicants wish to obtain a water finding with this application.
- Location
- 3195 COUNTY LINE RD; 20040 CAPELLA DR; COUNTY LINE RD, 80132
- Jurisdiction
- El Paso County
- Applicant
- Fairfield and Woods Todd Messenger
- Land owner (assessor)
- UNITED CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
- County project manager
- Joe Letke
- Filed
- May 28, 2026
- Parcels
- 7103000028, 7104000001, 7104000002, 7104001010
- Map
-
Parcel boundaries: Colorado public parcel data · Basemap © OpenStreetMap contributors
- Area map
- See all Tri-Lakes projects on the map
- Source record
- El Paso County EDARP file
Documents (33)
Agency Review CommentadditionalJul 23, 2026
Comments provided by Douglas County Dept of Community Development. 7/23/2026.
Neighbor Notice & Vicinity MapadditionalJul 1, 2026
Notice of Application letters were mailed to surrounding property owners on 7/1/2026. Notice combined with SP265. PR
Mailing LabelsadditionalJul 1, 2026
Mailing Labels for the 32 surrounding property owners that received notices. Cost = $23.68. PR
Agency review comments (38)
Parks Advisory Boardreview 2Aug 18, 2026
El Paso County Parks Department, Final Review Comments. Please See Attached Documentation for Park Advisory Board endorsed recommendations and comments - endorsed on August 12, 2026
EPC Parks Departmentreview 1Aug 6, 2026
El Paso County Parks Department, Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documentation (To be presented to the El Paso County Park Advisory Board for consideration and endorsement on August 12, 2026)
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 1Aug 3, 2026
Case No. 2025CW3027 is still pending in water court with multiple objectors as of 8/3/2026. This office cannot provide substantive comments on the water supply until a final decree is issued in Case No. 2025CW3027.
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Officereview 1Jul 20, 2026
Please refer to the attached letter for CDOT's comments regarding this development. CDOT has no concerns.
EPC DPW Stormwaterreview 1Jul 15, 2026
Preliminary Grading Plans Comments
EPC DPW Stormwaterreview 1Jul 15, 2026
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents:
- Landscape Plans
- PCM Applicability Form
- Preliminary Grading Plans
- Prelim Soils Report........................(uploaded by the project manager)
IF early grading is being proposed, the following documents will need to be submitted:
- ESQCP
- FAE
- GEC Plan
- GEC Checklist
- SWMP
- SWMP Checklist
Due to the nature of the comments provided, these comments are preliminary in nature and EPC DPW Stormwater reserves the right to make additional comments. Additional detailed comments will be provided upon receipt of complete information/plans and resolution of the major issues. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding this review.
Reviewed by:
Mikayla Hartford, P.E.
Senior Engineer - Stormwater
719.339.5053
MikaylaHartford@elpasoco.com
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Traffic Impact Study comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Preliminary Plan Drawings comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Soils & Geology Report comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
Planning has comments on the following documents:
-Letter of Intent
-Preliminary Plan Drawings
-Fire Protection Report
-Soils and Geology Report
-Wildland Fire Report
-Water Resources Report
-Wastewater Report
-Forest Management Plan (please sign)
-Water Resources Report
-Wetlands Report
Joe Letke
Planner
JoeLetke@elpasoco.com
Additional comments by Kari Parsons
Principal Planner
KariParsons@elpasoco.com
Please carefully review and consider the new fire code updates: https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/land-development-code-amendments-not-yet-codified/
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 1Jul 15, 2026
SP265 Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan Review 1
EA2456
P252
DPW – DS – Engineering
Review 1.
FYI: Utilize the County website as much as possible (all private and public road must be built to EPC standards), use the following link to take you to the County website: 2026-FAE-Form-Sidewalk-Addendum.xlsx
Engineering Comments have been provided on the following documents (to be uploaded by Project Manager).
- Deviation Requests
- Preliminary Drainage Report
- Preliminary Grading Plans
- Landscape Plans
- Letter of Intent
- Preliminary Plan Drawings (Not reviewed yet due to Planning Concept revisions requested)
- Soil and Geology Report
- Traffic Impact Study
- Road Impact Fee Acknowledgement form
- I was told by Mr. Bret Dilts of EPC – Engineering, that there is a piece of land at the Northwest corner of the site still not owned by the Developer (the church), please explain.
The applicant must upload the revised and missing items indicated below with his/her resubmittal:
- Deviation Requests on EPC FORMS.
- Preliminary Drainage Report
- Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plans
- Landscape Plans
- Letter of Intent
- Preliminary Plan Drawings (Not reviewed yet due to Planning Concept revisions)
- Soil and Geology Report
- Traffic Impact Study
- Road Impact Fee Acknowledgement form including the RIF calculations.
- (Missing) 2026 FAE, use the following link to download the necessary document: 2026-FAE-Form-V2.xlsx
- I was told by Mr. Bret Dilts of EPC LD – Engineering, that there is a piece of land at the Northwest corner of the site still not owned by the Developer (the church), please provide status.
The next submittal is considered the 1st submittal due to the extent of comments.
FYI:
1. P252: Rezone was approved, project site is not incorporated, EPC has jurisdiction (Palmer Lake has no jurisdiction).
I was told by Mr. Bret Dilts of EPC LD – Engineering, that there is a piece of land at the Northwest corner of the site still not owned by the Developer (the church), please provide status.
2. Assuming approval: Three Access Permits will be issued to the site after the building Plans are approved.
3. The project site is located outside the floodplain limits.
Please verify if the FYI items are correct and feel free to let me know if you have any corrections to them.
Reviewed by:
Jalal
Jalal Saleh, PE
jalalsaleh@elpasoco.com
719-520-7550
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Water Resources Report comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Wildland Fire & Hazard Mitigation Plan comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Wastewater Disposal Report comments
PCD Project Managerreview 1Jul 15, 2026
-V1_Fire Protection Report comments
CORE Electric Co-opreview 1Jul 15, 2026
CORE has existing overhead electric facilities located on the subject property. CORE intends to maintain its existing utility easements and facilities unless the applicant requests modifications in accordance with CORE's current extension and relocation policies.
At this time, CORE does not support approval of the Preliminary Plan or Landscape Plan as submitted. Significant revisions will be required to bring the plans into compliance with the requirements outlined in the CORE Builder Handbook.
The applicant must revise the proposed utility easements and any overlapping El Paso County Public Improvement Easements to ensure compatibility with CORE's facility requirements. In addition:
Proposed grading within utility easements shall not exceed 15% slopes.
Fire cisterns and similar facilities shall not be located within utility easements.
A 15-foot-wide utility easement will be required along County Line Road.
The proposed decorative wall may not encroach into any required utility easement area.
Utility Easement Requirements
Standard Easement Configuration
The submitted Typical Lot Standards and setback information must be revised to comply with CORE Electric Cooperative's minimum utility easement standards as follows:
Rear Lot Easement
A minimum 10-foot-wide utility easement shall be dedicated along the rear property line of each lot.
Corner Lots
A minimum 10-foot-wide utility easement shall be provided along the adjacent roadway right-of-way.
Side Lot Easements
Each lot shall provide a minimum 5-foot-wide utility easement along at least one side lot line, preferably on the garage side of the property.
Grading Limitations
Slopes within all utility easements shall not exceed 15%.
Alternative Easement Configuration
Where the standard easement configuration cannot be accommodated, CORE will require the following alternative easement layout:
A 15-foot-wide utility easement along the front property line in lieu of the rear lot easement.
A 15-foot-wide utility easement along all roadway rights-of-way, including corner lots.
A 15-foot-wide utility easement along all major roadways to accommodate primary distribution feeder infrastructure.
Slopes within all utility easements shall not exceed 15%.
Required Plat Note
The following note shall be included on both the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat:
Utility Easement Restrictions
No improvements that conflict with or interfere with the construction, maintenance, operation, or access to utility facilities shall be placed within utility easements. Prohibited improvements include, but are not limited to, permanent structures, buildings, counterforts, decks, attached porches, attached stairs, window wells, air conditioning units, retaining walls or retaining wall components, and any other objects that may interfere with utility facilities or the access, use, operation, and maintenance thereof.
The utility easements shown hereon are hereby dedicated for public utilities, cable communication systems, fiber optic facilities, and other utility purposes as shown. The entities responsible for providing utility services for which the easements are established are granted perpetual rights of ingress and egress across adjacent properties for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and removal of utility lines and associated facilities.
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 1Jul 14, 2026
Enumerations has the following comments:
1. Each of the streets shown will require a street name. Submit proposed street names to Justin Annan (jannan@eptc911.org) and Glenn West (gwest@eptc911.org) for approval.
2. The letter of intent states that the interior streets will be private. If they are private, then the suffixes approved for use with the street names are Heights, Grove, Point, or View.
3. Indicate on the plat that these streets are private next the street names once those approved.
4. Once street names have been approved, submit a copy of the plat for address assignment. Indicate with (XXXX) all locations where an address is required, especially lots with more than one potential access.
5. One existing building is shown as being relocated. Consult with the PPRBD permitting staff to determine what, if any, permits are required for the relocation.
6. The 2 existing buildings shown as 3195 and 3295 County Line Rd. will each require a formal address change as a part of this plat. Instructions for requesting an address change can be found here: https://www.pprbd.org/File/Resources/Downloads/Addressing/Request%20for%20change%20of%20address%20ACCESS.pdf An address change request must be submitted for each of the buildings at the time of mylar review.
7. Enumerations will review the mylar for this plat prior recording for addressing, title block, and street names. An Enumerations fee of $10 per lot/tract to which an address was assigned will be due at the time of mylar review.
Brent Johnson
Enumerations Plans Examiner
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org
County Attorney - Waterreview 1Jul 9, 2026
The County Attorney’s Office will begin review when an approved determination/augmentation plan has been uploaded as well as a letter from the Colorado Division of Water Resources with a water sufficiency finding.
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 1Jul 1, 2026
No comment from County Attorney – Development Review at this time.
Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Sr. County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com.
Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection Districtreview 1Jul 1, 2026
Provide a fire access plan sheet showing IFC 2021 Appendix D compliance: 20-foot minimum unobstructed fire apparatus access width, 13 feet 6 inches vertical clearance, turning radii, grades, dead-end lengths, turnarounds, and fire lane/no-parking signage.
Confirm fire apparatus access road design loading. Roads shall support imposed loads of fire apparatus, typically 75,000 pounds minimum unless the AHJ requires more.
Dead-end roads over 150 feet need approved turnarounds. Several cul-de-sac/hammerhead-style areas appear present, but each needs dimensions shown.
Grades need to be called out on the fire access plan. IFC Appendix D generally limits fire access roads to 10 percent unless specifically approved by the fire code official. This is a hillside site, so this is a major review item.
Provide a fire flow report. Show required fire flow per IFC Appendix B and available flow from the water district or approved alternative water supply.
Hydrant/cistern plan is incomplete. I saw a “15,000 fire cistern” note on the utility sheet, but the plan needs total capacity, location, fittings, drafting connection, access apron, turnaround, ownership, maintenance, and freeze protection details.
If relying on cisterns instead of a municipal hydrant system, submit design under NFPA 1142 or AHJ-approved rural water supply standard.
Hydrant or cistern spacing must be shown per IFC Appendix C. For residential development, the AHJ needs to verify maximum spacing and maximum distance from all lots/structures.
Secondary emergency access should be addressed. A 73-lot subdivision with long private roads should not rely on one practical access point unless specifically justified and approved.
Existing “fire access and maintenance roads” are shown to remain in Tract A, but they need ownership, surface, width, slope, gate control, year-round maintenance, and whether they are intended for emergency response clearly stated.
Gates, if proposed, require Knox-compatible emergency access, minimum clear width, setback from public road, and approved operation.
Road names and address ranges need early review for dispatch clarity. Avoid duplicate/confusing street names and provide address monument/signage standards.
Wildland-urban interface review should be required. This site has heavy open-space/wildland exposure and steep terrain. Require Colorado WRC/local WUI compliance for defensible space, ignition-resistant construction, Class A roofing, vegetation management, and long-term HOA maintenance.
Add a note that final building permits may require residential sprinklers if adopted locally or required by the AHJ based on access, water supply, grade, or WUI constraints.
Construction-phase access and water supply must be maintained before combustible construction begins.
PCD Administrative Noticereview 1Jul 1, 2026
On 7/1/2026, PCD mailed "Notice of Application" letters to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (32 addresses). Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage to be billed to the applicant = $23.68. Notice combined with project file # SP265. PR
E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 1Jun 26, 2026
Comments for E911 as follows:
The streets intended for this development will require streetnames.
Streetnaming information (criteria, existing/reserved names) can be found on our website at https://www.elpasoteller911.org/street-emergency-number-databases
Thank you.
Justin
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.review 1Jun 25, 2026
This project is outside Mountain View Electric Association service territory.
RBD Floodplainreview 1Jun 24, 2026
no comment
Land ownership timeline
- Oct 21, 2022Parcels 7104000001, 7104001010 acquired by UNITED CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — no sale price recorded, often a non-market transfer such as a deed into a related entity (assessor record)
- Dec 17, 2009Parcel 7104000002 acquired by UNITED CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — no sale price recorded, often a non-market transfer such as a deed into a related entity (assessor record)
Timeline
- Aug 18, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Parks Advisory Board
- Aug 18, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of Parks Advisory Board
- Aug 6, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC Parks Department
- Aug 5, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Town of Monument Planning
- Aug 3, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Colorado Division of Water Resources
- Jul 22, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
- Jul 20, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Jul 16, 2026Submission request sent to Applicant
- Jul 15, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jul 15, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by PCD Project Manager
- Jul 15, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
- Jul 15, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Colorado Geological Survey
- Jul 15, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by CORE Electric Co-op
- Jul 14, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
- Jul 11, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jul 9, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by County Attorney - Water
- Jul 1, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by County Attorney - Development Review
- Jul 1, 2026Payment Request sent: 7/1/2026
- Jul 1, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by PCD Administrative Notice
- Jun 30, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by EPC Environmental Services
- Jun 26, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Jun 25, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Brooks Kaufman on behalf of CORE Electric Co-op
- Jun 25, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments returned by RBD Floodplain
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Glen Smith on behalf of Town of Palmer Lake
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Erica Romero on behalf of Town of Palmer Lake
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Dawn Collins on behalf of Town of Palmer Lake
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of Town of Monument Planning
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Keith Curtis on behalf of RBD Floodplain
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Bill Crimmel on behalf of Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)(to also include the TLLU areas)
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Douglas County on behalf of Douglas County Planning
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Julie Reeves on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by george san miguel on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by George San Miguel on behalf of US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Daniel Delgado on behalf of US Army Corps of Engineers
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Mike Till on behalf of Colorado State Forest Service
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Victoria Poulton on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Travis Sauder on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Tim Kroening on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Peter Chapman on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Karen Voltura on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Carolyn Craveiro de Sa on behalf of Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Colorado Geological Survey on behalf of Colorado Geological Survey
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Mike Matz on behalf of Colorado Division of Water Resources
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Ailis Thyne on behalf of Colorado Division of Water Resources
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Teresa Guagliardo on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Michelle Regalado on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Kimberly Blanchard on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Adam Lancaster on behalf of Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Scott Benson on behalf of Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Jonathan Bradley on behalf of Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Aaron Wood on behalf of Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Vicki Wood on behalf of Lewis Palmer School District 38
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Melissa Andrews on behalf of Lewis Palmer School District 38
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Brett Ridgway on behalf of Lewis Palmer School District 38
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by General Email on behalf of Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Trish Riber on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Marcus Henderson on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Bob Swatek on behalf of Black Hills Energy-Aquila
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of Parks Advisory Board
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of EPC Public Works, County Engineer
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of EPC Public Works, County Engineer
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of EPC Parks Department
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Catherine McGarvy on behalf of EPC Health Department
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by HEAEH LandUse on behalf of EPC Health Department
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Kathy Andrew on behalf of EPC Environmental Services
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Zachary Jannusch on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Glenn Reese on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Mikayla Hartford on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Erica Rylander on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Christina Prete on behalf of EPC DPW Stormwater
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Gilbert LaForce on behalf of EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Engineering Manager on behalf of EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Justin Annan on behalf of E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Glenn West on behalf of E911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Lori Seago on behalf of County Attorney - Water
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Erika Keech on behalf of County Attorney - Water
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by April Willie on behalf of County Attorney - Water
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Lori Seago on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Erika Keech on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by April Willie on behalf of County Attorney - Development Review
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by Justin Kilgore on behalf of PCD Project Manager
- Jun 24, 2026Request for Review Comments email sent for Project Ben Lomand Mountain Village Preliminary Plan for review by on behalf of PCD Administrative Notice
- Jun 24, 2026Project Manager Assigned: Joe Letke
- Jun 24, 2026Fees paid: 6/24/2026 (Receipt: 1012220)
- Jun 17, 2026Payment Request sent: 6/17/2026
- Jun 17, 2026Submission Triaged
- Jun 17, 2026File # Assigned: SP265
- Jun 17, 2026Submission received from Applicant
- May 28, 2026Submission request sent to Applicant
- May 28, 2026Project Created