TriLakes Growth

Tracking development, land use, and new business across the Tri-Lakes region

A Monument Independent publication

← All projects

Iron Ridge Preliminary Plan

Preliminary plan SP253 No longer in review

Preliminary plan to include ~28 lots and 1 tract

Location
WALKER RD, 80908
Jurisdiction
El Paso County
Applicant
Vertex Consulting Services Nina Ruiz
Land owner (assessor)
ATTICUS LAND LLC (state record)
County project manager
Joe Letke
Filed
May 1, 2025
Parcels
6100000439, 6100000457
Map
Parcel boundaries: Colorado public parcel data · Basemap © OpenStreetMap contributors
Area map
See all Tri-Lakes projects on the map
Source record
El Paso County EDARP file

Documents (65)

Deviation RequestapprovedApr 30, 2026
Traffic Impact StudyapprovedApr 30, 2026
Drainage Report - PreliminaryapprovedApr 30, 2026
Letter of IntentreviewMay 14, 2026
Preliminary Plan DrawingsreviewApr 29, 2026
Water Resources ReportreviewApr 27, 2026
Deviation Road LengthreviewJan 28, 2026
Deviation RequestreviewJan 7, 2026
Preliminary Plan ResponsereviewJan 7, 2026
Brown Court DeviationreviewJan 7, 2026
PCMreviewJan 7, 2026
PDR Comment ResponsereviewDec 4, 2025
Deviation Request #2reviewDec 4, 2025
PCM Comment ResponsereviewDec 4, 2025
PCM Applicability FormreviewDec 4, 2025
Fire Protection ReportreviewNov 12, 2025
Traffic Impact StudyreviewNov 12, 2025
TIS Comment ResponsereviewNov 11, 2025
Subdivision Summary SheetreviewSep 24, 2025
OWTS ReportreviewSep 24, 2025
Soils & Geology ReportreviewSep 24, 2025
Variance RequestreviewSep 17, 2025
Grading Plan - PreliminaryreviewSep 17, 2025
Fire Commitment LetterreviewAug 28, 2025
Application/Petition FormreviewAug 28, 2025
Clearance Letter - USF&WreviewAug 6, 2025
Wetland Delineation ReportreviewJul 28, 2025
Natural Features ReportreviewJul 21, 2025
Recorded BOCC ResolutionadditionalJul 31, 2026
SP253 RECORDED BOCC RESOLUTION - 26-234
BOCC Hearing AgendaadditionalJul 20, 2026
Hearing Agenda for the Board of County Commissioners hearing on 07/23/2026. JM
BOCC Staff Report - final with attachmentsadditionalJul 10, 2026
Staff Report for the Board of County Commissioners hearing on 07/23/2026. JM
Adopted PC MinutesadditionalJul 7, 2026
Adopted Minutes from the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026. JM
Signed PC ResolutionadditionalJun 22, 2026
Recommendation from the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026. JM
PC Staff Report - final with attachmentsadditionalJun 16, 2026
Updated Staff Report for the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026. JM
Posters on PropertyadditionalJun 8, 2026
PC & BOCC PosteradditionalJun 4, 2026
Poster for the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026 and the Board of County Commissioners hearing on 07/23/2026. JM
Mailing Labels - Hearing NoticeadditionalJun 4, 2026
Mailing Labels for the 17 surrounding property owners that received notices. PCD mailed the letters on 06/03/2026. Cost = $12.58. JM
Selected Range - Hearing NoticeadditionalJun 4, 2026
Selected Range was 500 feet. JM
Hearing Notice & Vicinity MapadditionalJun 4, 2026
Hearing Notice for the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026 and the Board of County Commissioners hearing on 07/23/2026. JM
PC Hearing AgendaadditionalJun 4, 2026
Hearing Agenda for the Planning Commission hearing on 06/18/2026. JM
Email communication between the developer and neighboring HOA presidentadditionalNov 17, 2025
This attached email is discourse between Nina Ruiz of Vertex Consulting and neighboring property owner Kirk Dickenson regarding proposal changes based upon feedback.
Schneider - Opposition - 10.24.25additionalOct 27, 2025
Dickenson - Opposition - 10.23.25additionalOct 27, 2025
Anderson - Opposition - 10.13.25additionalOct 27, 2025
Returned NoticesadditionalOct 23, 2025
Returned Notice - Received 10/23/2025
Returned NoticesadditionalOct 20, 2025
Returned Notice - Received 10/17/2025
Mailing LabelsadditionalSep 30, 2025
Mailing Labels for the 17 surrounding property owners that received notices. Cost = $12.58. JM
Neighbor Notice & Vicinity MapadditionalSep 30, 2025
Notice of Application letters were mailed to surrounding property owners on 09/30/2025. JM
Selected RangeadditionalSep 30, 2025
Selected Range was 500 feet. JM

Agency review comments (49)

Comments returned by referral agencies during review, from the county's public EDARP file. Some agencies attach a letter instead of (or alongside) written comments.

County Attorney - Waterreview 5May 14, 2026
See attached Water Supply Review and Recommendations.
View attached comment letter
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 4Apr 30, 2026
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 4Apr 20, 2026
View attached comment letter
County Attorney - Waterreview 4Apr 13, 2026
In both the Water Supply Information Summary (WSIS) and Water Resources Report (WRR) house-hold use is listed at .26 af/y which totals 7.28 af/y with a use of “other” listed at .543 af/y which totals 15.204 af/y. 7.28 af/y +15.204=22.484 af/y although the requested demand in both WSIS & WRR is listed at 24.09 af/y. Please account for the extra 1.606 af/y or update and upload new WSIS/WRR. Page 3 of the WRR mentions that the “other” demand of .543 af/y per lot water will be utilized for irrigation, stock water, recreation (including pool and/or hot tob), landscape ponds, commercial, fire protection. Please break down the specific uses using the guidelines in LDC (B)(7)(d)&(e). After the above has been addressed, and a new letter from the Colorado Division of Water Resources has been received showing sufficient water, we will begin review.
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 4Apr 8, 2026
DPW Engineering review 4 Comments have been resolved on the following documents - Deviation Request (Cul-de-sac length) Engineering documents will be routed to the engineering manager for County approval. Review by Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com 719-520-6864
PCD Project Managerreview 4Apr 8, 2026
Planning has no further comments. Joe Letke Planner JoeLetke@elpasoco.com
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 26, 2026
Planning has comments on the following version 3 document: -LOI Joe Letke Planner JoeLetke@elpasoco.com
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 26, 2026
-V3 LOI
View attached comment letter
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 3Jan 26, 2026
DPW Engineering has comments on the following documents - Deviation Request (Cul-de-sac length) - minor comments and needs owners signature Comments have been resolved on the following documents - Deviation Request (Brown Court) Review by Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com 719-520-6864
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 3Jan 26, 2026
Deviation Request (Cul-de-sac length)
View attached comment letter
EPC DPW Stormwaterreview 3Jan 20, 2026
Review 3: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following document(s): - PCM Applicability Form EPC DPW Stormwater has no further comments. EPC Project Manager: no re-review necessary. Reviewed by: Zachary Jannusch Associate Engineer - Stormwater 719.500.3170 ZacharyJannusch@elpasoco.com
County Attorney - Waterreview 3Jan 14, 2026
The County Attorney’s Office will begin review when approved decree and replacement plan/augmentation plan has been uploaded as well as a letter from the Colorado Division of Water Resources with a water sufficiency finding.
PCD Project Managerreview 2Dec 29, 2025
-V2 Deviation Request #2
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Dec 29, 2025
-V2 LOI
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Dec 29, 2025
-V2 Preliminary Plan Drawings
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Dec 29, 2025
Planning has comments on the following version two documents: -LOI -Preliminary Plan Drawings Joe Letke Planner JoeLetke@elpasoco.com
Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection Districtreview 2Dec 29, 2025
1. Proposed roads meet adopted fire code standards for fire department access. 2. Proposed 30,000 gallon firefighting cistern is acceptable. 3. This development will be subject to the Colorado Wildfire Resiliency Code requirements if permitted after June 30, 2026
View attached comment letter
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 2Dec 29, 2025
DPW Engineering has comments on the following documents - Deviation Request (Cul-de-sac length deviation was not resubmitted), see comments from review 1 - Deviation Request #2 Comments have been resolved on the following documents - Traffic Impact study - Preliminary Plan Drawings - Drainage Report - Preliminary The initial deviation request does not seem to have been resubmitted for exceeding the cul-du-sac length. Please include a revised version addressing comments made with review 1. Please include a signed version of the drainage report with the next submittal. Review by Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com 719-520-6864
EPC DPW Stormwaterreview 2Dec 29, 2025
Review 2: All EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been addressed. Please sign/date/stamp and resubmit the following document(s): - PCM Applicability Form EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following document(s): - Preliminary Plan Drawings - Preliminary Drainage Report Reviewed by: Zachary Jannusch Associate Engineer - Stormwater 719.500.3170 ZacharyJannusch@elpasoco.com
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 1Dec 23, 2025
View attached comment letter
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 2Dec 23, 2025
Review #2: No comment from County Attorney – Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com.
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 2Dec 18, 2025
1. Existing Brown Rd coming in from the north should be a logical continuation into this subdivision. Please update plans to show Brown Road. 2. When submitting the development plan to Enumerations for addressing, please be sure to send us a copy that does not have topography or elevation lines. We need a clean, clear copy to add addresses. See standard development plan comments below: 1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door, and should be placed as close to the edge of the lot as possible, running parallel to the street it is being addressed from. 2. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p.) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. Thank you, Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org E: beckya@pprbd.org
County Attorney - Waterreview 2Dec 17, 2025
Please see comments from 10/7/25. No additional comments until those have been resolved. Thanks!
EPC Parks Departmentreview 2Dec 15, 2025
El Paso County Parks Comments: See attached documentation for the second review. Thank you! Ashlyn Mathy Parks Planner Park Planning Division El Paso County Parks Department Office 719.520.6999
View attached comment letter
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 2Dec 11, 2025
Comments for E911 as follows: Iron Ridge Ct should instead be a logical continuation of existing Brown Rd. Colt Ct – Acceptable logical continuation of existing road. Thank you Justin
El Paso County Conservation Distreview 1Oct 30, 2025
No comments at this time.
EPC Health Departmentreview 1Oct 28, 2025
View attached comment letter
EPC Parks Departmentreview 1Oct 27, 2025
El Paso County Parks Staff Preliminary Comments: Please See Attached Documentation. This project will be presented before the Parks Advisory Board on November 12, 2025. Thank you! Ashlyn Mathy Parks Planner Park Planning Division El Paso County Parks Department Office 719.520.6999
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 PCM Applicability Form
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Drainage Report - Preliminary
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Deviation Request
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Traffic Impact Study
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Fire Protection Report
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Preliminary Plan Drawings
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 20, 2025
-V1 Letter of Intent
View attached comment letter
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineeringreview 1Oct 20, 2025
DPW Engineering has comments on the following documents - Traffic Impact Study - Preliminary Plan Drawings - Deviation Request - Drainage Report - Preliminary Review by Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com 719-520-6864
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 1Oct 20, 2025
No Comments from County Attorney – Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com.
EPC DPW Stormwaterreview 1Oct 20, 2025
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded document(s): - PCM Applicability Form - Preliminary Drainage Report - Preliminary Plan Drawings Reviewed by: Zachary Jannusch Associate Engineer - Stormwater 719.500.3170 ZacharyJannusch@elpasoco.com
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 1Oct 17, 2025
1. We agree with Emergency Services 9-1-1 that existing Brown Rd coming in from the north should be a logical continuation into this subdivision. Please update plans to show Brown Road. 2. When submitting the development plan to Enumerations for addressing, please be sure to send us a copy that does not have topography or elevation lines. We need a clean, clear copy to add addresses. See standard development plan comments below: 1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door, and should be placed as close to the edge of the lot as possible, running parallel to the street it is being addressed from. 2. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p.) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. Thank you, Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org E: beckya@pprbd.org
PCD Project Managerreview 1Oct 16, 2025
Planning has comments on the following version one documents: -Letter of Intent -Preliminary Plan Drawings -Fire Protection Report Joe Letke Planner JoeLetke@elpasoco.com
EPC Fire and Wildfire Program Managerreview 1Oct 16, 2025
This submittal is acceptable for this stage of development. The site is only partially vegetated. Please provide additional detail on the access to lots 4, 5, 7 and the turn around for the cistern in the Final Plat. Roland Peterson Fire Safety and Wildfire Mitigation Program Manager Planning & Community Development 719.520.6075
Colorado Geological Surveyreview 1Oct 15, 2025
View attached comment letter
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.review 1Oct 8, 2025
See attached comment letter
View attached comment letter
Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection Districtreview 1Oct 7, 2025
Please provide more detail for access to lots 4, 5, 7 in phase 1 (page 2 of preliminary plan).
County Attorney - Waterreview 1Oct 7, 2025
The County Attorney’s Office will begin review when approved decree and replacement plan/augmentation plan has been uploaded as well as a letter from the Colorado Division of Water Resources with a water sufficiency finding. Please note that the Water Supply Information Summary does not identify an estimated demand for irrigation or stock watering (or landscape ponds/commercial as listed as possible water uses in the Water Resource Report). If no demand is proposed, those uses of water will be prohibited.
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 1Oct 7, 2025
Comments for E911 as follows: Iron Ridge Ct should instead be a logical continuation of existing Brown Rd. Colt Ct – Acceptable logical continuation of existing road. Thank you Justin
EPC Environmental Servicesreview 1Sep 30, 2025
View attached comment letter
PCD Administrative Noticereview 1Sep 30, 2025
On 09/30/2025, PCD mailed "Notice of Application" letters to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (17 addresses). Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage to be billed to the applicant = $12.58. JM
RBD Floodplainreview 1Sep 29, 2025
site not in the floodplain, no comment

Land ownership timeline

The documented chain of ownership per parcel, from El Paso County Assessor records and TriLakes Growth's monthly re-checks. Where the record hasn't been collected yet, the gap is shown rather than papered over.

Timeline