TriLakes Growth

Tracking development, land use, and new business across the Tri-Lakes region

A Monument Independent publication

← All projects

Sanctuary of Peace Residential Community at Benet Hill

PUD / preliminary plan PUDSP192 Active

PUDPreliminary Plan for 27 single-family attached lots, private business event center for the community only with 4 guest rooms, shared well and septic and open space; A typo on the PUD to increase lot coverage due to a typo from 45% to 60 % is verified ok- May 4, 2023

Location
15760 Hwy 83 COS, CO 80921
Jurisdiction
El Paso County
Applicant
M.V.E., Inc. David Gorman
County project manager
Kari Parsons
Filed
Oct 31, 2018
Parcel
6127000063
Map
Parcel boundaries: Colorado public parcel data · Basemap © OpenStreetMap contributors
Source record
El Paso County EDARP file

Documents (89)

Letter of IntentreviewNov 24, 2020
Subdivision Summary SheetreviewNov 24, 2020
Deviation RequestreviewOct 9, 2020
Deviation RequestreviewOct 9, 2020
Deviation RequestreviewOct 9, 2020
DeviationsreviewOct 9, 2020
Water Resources ReportreviewAug 20, 2020
Emergency Access EsmtsreviewJul 25, 2020
Financial Assurance FormsreviewJul 25, 2020
PBMP-Applicability-FormreviewDec 23, 2019
EPC Health Comments ReplyreviewDec 23, 2019
GEC/SWMP ChecklistreviewDec 23, 2019
Traffic Impact StudyreviewDec 23, 2019
Soils & Geology ReportreviewDec 23, 2019
61087 SOP PDB-BMP AgreementreviewSep 16, 2019
Vicinity/Location MapreviewSep 16, 2019
Wastewater Disposal ReportreviewSep 16, 2019
Fire Commitment LetterreviewSep 16, 2019
Application/Petition FormreviewSep 16, 2019
Maintenance PlanreviewFeb 22, 2019
CovenantsreviewJan 11, 2019
Forestry Management PlanreviewJan 11, 2019
Wildlife ReportreviewJan 11, 2019
Natural Features ReportreviewJan 11, 2019
PC ResolutionadditionalJan 29, 2021
Recorded PUDSPadditionalJan 27, 2021
Deviation Curve RadiiadditionalJan 12, 2021
Approved
Deviation Sidewalk-NO 2additionalJan 12, 2021
Approved
Deviation Lane WidthadditionalJan 12, 2021
Approved
Deviation SidewalkadditionalJan 12, 2021
Approved
TISadditionalJan 12, 2021
Accepted
SWMPadditionalJan 12, 2021
Accepted
Drainage Report ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
FAE ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
GEC ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
ESQCP ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
SWMPadditionalJan 12, 2021
Accepted
Drainage Report ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
FAE ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
GEC ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
ESQCP ApprovedadditionalJan 12, 2021
Recorded BoCC ResolutionadditionalDec 22, 2020
PC Approval LetteradditionalDec 8, 2020
Adj Prop CommentadditionalDec 8, 2020
Adj Prop CommentadditionalDec 8, 2020
BOCC Staff ReportadditionalDec 8, 2020
Completed Site PostingadditionalNov 9, 2020
Notice of Public HearingadditionalNov 9, 2020
Picture of PostingadditionalNov 5, 2020
Posting NotificationadditionalNov 5, 2020
Vicinity MapadditionalNov 5, 2020
PC Poster With BOCC PosteradditionalNov 5, 2020
Shopper PressadditionalNov 5, 2020
General Notice to PC and BOCCadditionalNov 5, 2020
LabelsadditionalNov 5, 2020
ChecklistadditionalNov 5, 2020
PC Staff ReportadditionalNov 5, 2020

Agency review comments (85)

Comments returned by referral agencies during review, from the county's public EDARP file. Some agencies attach a letter instead of (or alongside) written comments.

EPC County Attorney's Officereview 3Nov 5, 2020
View attached comment letter
PCD Engineering Divisionreview 5Oct 28, 2020
The Applicant provided the requested forms: MS4 and SDI worksheet. The Applicant provided the deviation request for sidewalk on one side only. The ECM administrator acknowledged this deviation and the others as indicated on the Letter of Intent. Comment letter items are resolved. PCD engineering has no further comments Steve Kuehster 719-520-6813
PCD Project Managerreview 5Oct 28, 2020
Staff has prepare the item for the November 19th PC and December 8th BoCC pending a water finding from the CAO. Cole Emmons has been assigned to the water review. You may have your water attorney reach out to him to see if Cole has questions that can be quickly answered.
PCD Project Managerreview 5Oct 23, 2020
LOI comments
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 4Sep 1, 2020
Please submit the deviation forms for the modifications not covered under the explanation provided in the engineer review letter...We can conference call on this if needed.
PCD Project Managerreview 4Sep 1, 2020
Staff will schedule the item for PC as soon as a water review from the CAO is made.
PCD Project Managerreview 4Sep 1, 2020
PUDSP review 4 - Very minor comments to be addressed
View attached comment letter
PCD Engineering Divisionreview 4Sep 1, 2020
See comment letter, V-4 Steve Kuehster PCD Engineering
View attached comment letter
Parks Advisory Boardreview 3Aug 27, 2020
See updated Parks review attached
View attached comment letter
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 3Aug 25, 2020
No comments from County Attorney's Office - Development Review at this time.
EPC Health Departmentreview 3Aug 23, 2020
View attached comment letter
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Officereview 3Aug 19, 2020
No further comments are needed. Updated CDOT Access Permit was done and handle all issues within the permit. Thank you.
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)review 3Aug 18, 2020
Our last review, dated October 7, 2019, remains valid. We have no further comments at this time. NEPCO Transportation and Land Use Committee
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 3Aug 17, 2020
Regarding a request for approval of a development plan for Sanctuary of Peace/Benet Hill Monastery, Enumerations has the following comments: 1. Once this development plan is approved, the applicant should submit a copy of the development for addressing. Secondary structures which will require separate addresses and building permits such as gazebos, trash enclosures, garages, etc. should be shown on the plan so that a comprehensive addressing plan can be created. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org
Colorado Parks and Wildlifereview 3Aug 13, 2020
View attached comment letter
EPC Parks Departmentreview 3Aug 6, 2020
Please see administrative Parks comments attached. Greg
View attached comment letter
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.review 3Aug 5, 2020
View attached comment letter
EPC Environmental Servicesreview 3Jul 30, 2020
View attached comment letter
Black Forest Land Use Committeereview 3Jul 30, 2020
This proposal is outside the boundaries of the Black Forest Preservation Plan so the Land Use Committee will not make comments on it.
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 3Jul 28, 2020
No new Street Naming, PROMISE POINT has been reserved for this project. No action required by E911. G. West
Lewis Palmer 38review 3Jul 28, 2020
Lewis-Palmer School District 38 has no further comment at this time.
EPC County Attorney's Officereview 1Feb 12, 2020
The County Attorney's Office is working with PCD and Applicant on them providing satisfactory documentation related to the water supply. When those issues are resolved, the County Attorney's Office will provide a review of water sufficiency. Edi Anderson
EPC Health Departmentreview 2Jan 27, 2020
View attached comment letter
PCD Engineering Divisionreview 3Jan 23, 2020
See Comment Letter; Steve Kuehster 719-520-6813
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
Note: The pre-development site grading form will need to be completed and brought to the precon meeting along with the approved FAE and Collateral.
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
SWMP Redlines review 3
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
PUDSP Redlines review 3 minor changes...
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
PUD Modifications- same comments as LOI. redlines removing 3 modifications and editing 1 modification.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
Letter of Intent
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
Provide communication that their is no issue with the CDOT access permit for the added uses.
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
Grading & Erosion Control Plan. Please revise and sign for approval. Please sign the drainage report for approval.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
FAE Redlines revise and sign for approval.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 23, 2020
Has the applicant drilled the new well? CDPHE requires the water testing source points for a public water system to come from the new well on the proposed project site. Please work with Mike Mccarthy to obtain a water finding for quantity. Please work with Lori to obtain a water finding for water dependability.
PCD Project Managerreview 3Jan 16, 2020
The emergency access easement utilizes a non descriptive colored exhibit for a few pages. Please depict the easement through the private property owners like you did for the agreement between PIne Avenue and the property. Where is Pine Avenue on the colored exhibit? Where is the physical emergency access easement in the colored exhibit? One of the exhibits should show the proposed property and the proposed roads and easements (ER access in lieu of 83)....
EPC Health Departmentreview 1Dec 3, 2019
View attached comment letter
Parks Advisory Boardreview 1Oct 31, 2019
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 04/09/2019)
View attached comment letter
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 2Oct 23, 2019
View attached comment letter
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 2Oct 23, 2019
View attached comment letter
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmentreview 2Oct 21, 2019
View attached comment letter
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 2Oct 21, 2019
Regarding a request for approval of a PUD development plan for Sanctuary of Peace Residential Community, Enumerations has the following comments: 1. The layout of this project has changed since the first submittal. Once the design is finalized and the development plan has been approved, the applicant should provide a copy of this development to Enumerations for addressing. Indicate with (XXXX) all lots and tracts which will require an address. These addresses must appear on the final plat. Floodplain has no comment. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)review 2Oct 20, 2019
This is the same review/file that is also attached under the Tri-Lakes Land Use Committee. Please see the TLLUC review comment for an explanation.
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)review 2Oct 20, 2019
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Provide the locations of the wastewater systems; these should be in a stand alone tract or easement. How will homeowners obtain permission to address a personal home blockage?
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Submit the pre-development form. Submit the FAE and other engineering docs. LOI Redlines Review 2-
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
PUD Modification Letter Comments. Your missing design standards in Chapter 8 that should be included if your choosing to seek modifications. Staff can not support platting lots with no physical connection to the private road as depicted now on the PUDSP.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Does the water report allocated usage include the 4 bedrooms within the community center?
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Traffic Study Comments 2
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
SWMP redlines; checklist needed.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Grading & Erosion Control Plan redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Grading &Erosion Control Checklist Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Provide the Cistern location and detail on the PUDSP Plan that the fire district is requiring. Identify in the notes who is maintain and installing the cistern Identify the cistern as an allowable use in the development standards.
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
Drainage redlines review 2
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
CDPHE Review 2
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 16, 2019
PUDSP Redlines review 2-Please review the checklists for a preliminary plan and PUD. Please also review the Code chapter 5, 7,& 8. Many things are not addressed.
View attached comment letter
PCD Engineering Divisionreview 2Oct 15, 2019
See Comment Letter Steve Kuehster 719-520-6813
View attached comment letter
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 2Oct 8, 2019
All street names previously approved. No action for 911. Thank you. Justin
County Attorney - Development Reviewreview 1Oct 7, 2019
1. You have submitted the template PDB-BMP Agreement that provides for Owner maintenance of the tract(s) upon which the detention facilities will be constructed. Your documents also indicate, however, that the intent is for the HOA to maintain them. If the applicant retains ownership of the tracts, then it is the applicant that will be responsible to the County for maintenance of the detention facilities, and it is the applicant that the County will look to for reimbursement if they aren't maintained and the County has to come in and do some repair work. If the applicant wishes the HOA to be responsible to the County, then the detention pond tracts must ultimately be conveyed to the HOA, and the Owner-HOA template Agreement must be used. Please confirm which approach you wish to take. The Agreement currently submitted has not yet been reviewed in detail. 2. I do not recommend the form of emergency access agreement you have submitted. They make no provision for construction and maintenance of improvements. They also grant the general public access to the easement area, thus granting the public certain rights on the burdened properties.
PCD Project Managerreview 2Oct 7, 2019
Soil & Geo Redlines from April 2019- Engineering.
View attached comment letter
Tri Lakes Land Use Committeereview 1Oct 7, 2019
We just noticed that this request for review was sent to the Tri-Lakes Land Use Committee (TLLUC) rather than to NEPCO. Since we previously reviewed this application and some members of the NEPCO LUC serve on both committees, we have continued to process this review and just posted it on the EDARP site. Please note for the future that relevant review requests sent to one or both organizations (TLLUC and NEPCO) will likely be processed by the NEPCO group.
Tri Lakes Land Use Committeereview 1Oct 7, 2019
View attached comment letter
Colorado Geological Surveyreview 2Oct 3, 2019
The Geologic Conditions note / Geologic Hazard Disclosure Statement on Sheet 1 of the PUD Development Plan / Preliminary Plat, Cover Sheet, is appropriate and correctly references Entech Engineering's 2/11/2019 Soil, Geology and Geologic Hazard Study, Sanctuary of Peace Filing No. 1. The geologic hazards mapped on Sheet 2 of the PUD Development Plan / Preliminary Plat, Site Plan (Overall) are consistent with Entech's mapping. Provided Entech's recommendations are adhered to, CGS has no objection to PUD and plat approval.
Lewis Palmer 38review 1Apr 12, 2019
At their monthly meeting on April 8, 2019, the Lewis-Palmer School District Board of Education voted to request cash in-lieu-of land funding for homes permitted in this development. Additionally, the Board does wish to inform the El Paso County Planning Commission of the following: "Lewis-Palmer School District is nearing capacity at all schools in the district for grades K-8. The Ray Kilmer Elementary School and the Lewis-Palmer Middle School, which will house the students from this development, are projected to be at or exceeding program capacity for the upcoming school year. The school district is in the process of planning additional schools. Such planning will result in a ballot issue, which must pass to allow for relief. Whereas the Board of Education’s role is to ensure all students in Lewis-Palmer School District receive a quality education, we must advise the Planning Commission that continued housing growth without additional schools will ultimately impact the quality education for which Lewis-Palmer School District is known."
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Traffic Study Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Drainage Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
PUD Preliminary Plan Drawing Redlines. A comment review meeting is recommended.
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
LOI Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Fire Commitment Redlines (Include support for PUD Modifications)
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Wastewater Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Grading Erosion Control redlines with Summary
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
PUD Modification Redlines
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
Application Redline
View attached comment letter
PCD Project Managerreview 1Apr 1, 2019
PUDSP Checklist
View attached comment letter
PCD Engineering Divisionreview 1Mar 26, 2019
See Comment Letter
View attached comment letter
Colorado Division of Water Resourcesreview 1Mar 26, 2019
View attached comment letter
Black Forest Land Use Committeereview 1Mar 24, 2019
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has reviewed this proposal and has coordinated with NEPCO regarding inputs to PCD since the proposed development is in the Tri-Lakes Comprehensive Plan. If this development were in the Black Forest planning area, 26 homes would be more than permitted on A-5 and RR-5 zoned property. However, many of the conservation efforts in this proposal reduce the impact to the point where the 26 homes would be very close to the impact of individual homes on larger acreages and even less considering that 46 acres of forest will remain undeveloped. The Land Use Committee does not see this as setting a precedent for more dense development but rather a rational view of the extreme conservation efforts of the Benet Hill Monastery. The Land Use Committee would like to recommend that a deed restriction be recorded by the Benet Hill Monastery that would prohibit any further development on this 50-acre parcel as a legal protection for the remaining 46 acres.
EPC Parks Departmentreview 1Mar 22, 2019
View attached comment letter
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmentreview 1Mar 20, 2019
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Please note that the following requirements are not intended to be an exhaustive list and it is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to comply with all applicable rules and regulations. • Based on the application, the system appears to be proposing to expand their public water system. The supplier of water must meet all requirements of Regulation 11 related, but not limited, to records, monitoring, design review, operations, storage, and backflow prevention. • Based on the information provided, the system appears to be installing multiple onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) in an attempt to have each system meet the requirements of WQSA Policy 6. While each appears to be separated, the information provided does not allow the division to analyze and determine if each of these OWTS are or are not domestic wastewater treatment works. All treatment works, including onsite wastewater treatment systems, designed to receive 2,000 gallons per day or greater based on the average daily flow at full occupancy are considered domestic wastewater treatment works and must have site location and design approval and a state discharge permit. Additional information related to each service area is required to make a determination regarding whether each OWTS is a domestic wastewater treatment works are requires site location and design approval by the division.
Black Forest Trails Associationreview 1Mar 18, 2019
On the PUD Development and Preliminary Plan, in the Tract Notes, Sanctuary of Peace Tract Table, Tracts B-F: trails are mentioned. However, there don't appear to be any specifics elsewhere relative to trails. Trails in new developments are encouraged for the benefit of residents. This subdivision is close to Fox Run Regional Park and trails could potentially connect in the future to those in the Park. Please keep us informed of further updates on this development. Thank you.
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)review 1Mar 18, 2019
View attached comment letter
Pikes Peak Regional Building Departmentreview 1Mar 18, 2019
Regarding a request for approval of a PUD development plan for The Sanctuary of Peace Residential Community, Enumerations has the following comments: 1. The street shown on the plan as Tract A should be a named street. Submit a list of proposed street names to Justin Annan (jannan@elpasoteller911.org) with 911 for approval. Once a street name is established, it should appear on the development plan. All addressing for this development will be from this named street. 2. The applicant should provide a copy of the development plan to Enumerations so that addressing can be established to be used on the final plat. Page 3 shows an area labeled as “proposed garages”. Any structures such as garages which will require separate addresses and permits should be shown on the plan provided to Enumerations. While these addresses do not need to appear on the plat, knowing their location will help us to assign consistent addressing throughout the development. Floodplain has no comment or objection. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
Colorado Geological Surveyreview 1Mar 15, 2019
The site is not exposed to any geologic hazards or geotechnical constraints that would preclude the proposed residential use and density. Entech's 2/11/2019 Soil, Geology and Geologic Hazard Study, Sanctuary of Peace Filing No. 1 report contains appropriate recommendations for mitigating the site's potential development constraints, which include expansive soils and bedrock. CGS agrees that the "potentially unstable slope" mapped by Entech in the northern portion of the site (along Benet Lane behind proposed lot 2) is not high, is in sandstone bedrock, and is stable in its current condition. Provided Entech's recommendations are adhered to, CGS has no objection to PUD and site plan approval.
EPC Environmental Servicesreview 1Mar 7, 2019
View attached comment letter
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.review 1Feb 28, 2019
View attached comment letter
Colorado State Forest Servicereview 1Feb 28, 2019
The Wildfire Hazard & Mitigation Report submitted for this project is sufficient to identify the wildfire hazards and provides sound recommendations to reduce those hazards. If the report is followed by the developer and the future home owners, no other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. The Colorado State Forest Service recommends that all forested acres be mitigated to reduce the risk of wildfire and that defensible space be created for each dwelling using the standards in “Protecting Your Home From Wildfire: Creating Wildfire-Defensible Zones“ FIRE 2012-1 located on the Colorado State Forest Service website. http://static.colostate.edu/client-files/csfs/pdfs/FIRE2012_1_DspaceQuickGuide.pdf In addition, I recommend that all wildfire mitigation be completed before or during dwelling construction.
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller Countyreview 1Feb 27, 2019
Request the contractor submit a street name for this development. Would not recommend that addressing try to be accomplished off Benet Lane, could become confusing for emergency services.
View attached comment letter

Timeline